Heitman News

News Date Title Text1 Text2 Text3 Title
23 Feb 2011
Bank of America and U.S. Bank both report: “Businesses are borrowing again!” <p>Some good news related to the U.S. economy as reported by Pallavi Gogoi, for the AP Business Wire today.<br />&#8220;Martin Foil&#8217;s company sells yarn that winds up in clothes from the Gap, Ralph Lauren and American Apparel, and business is growing. He&#8217;s buying new machines and hopes to hire as many as 200 workers this year.</p><p>When he decided to expand into a shuttered yarn factory in North Carolina, he borrowed $11 million recently from Wells Fargo to buy it.</p><p>&#8220;It was a Hanes factory that was closed for a couple of years and had some good equipment — we knew we could crank up that place,&#8221; said Foil, who also used the loan to buy equipment and another factory in South Carolina. &#8220;We have the advantage of being stronger at a time when others aren&#8217;t.&#8221;</p><p>Now that demand is up and business is finally improving for many companies, they&#8217;re doing what they always do at the beginning of an expansion — calling the bank and asking for a loan.</p><p>And in a stark contrast to the depths of the financial crisis, the banks are saying yes.</p><p>In the last three months of 2010, U.S. Bancorp wrote $8 billion in new business loans, the most in two years. JPMorgan Chase added 400 midsize companies as clients. And bank loans overall grew for the first time in two years, according to the Federal Reserve.</p><p>&#8220;Companies are talking about growth in ways they haven&#8217;t for three years,&#8221; says Perry Pelos, head of Wells Fargo&#8217;s commercial banking.</p><p>Loans are one of the best gauges of economic growth. Small and midsize businesses that form the backbone of the U.S. economy take them out to pay for business needs — unlike big corporations, which go to the bond markets for low-cost debt.</p><p>Borrowing by smaller companies is being watched especially closely because it may indicate those companies are preparing to hire. So far, the economic recovery hasn&#8217;t been accompanied by job growth. Small companies created about three of every five new jobs over the past two decades.</p><p>Those companies took a pummeling during the recession. Bankruptcies skyrocketed and led to massive job cuts. Firms employing fewer than nine people accounted for more than half the jobs lost in the first quarter of 2010, just after the recession technically ended, according to the Labor Department.</p><p>Many small businesses blame banks for making matters worse by pulling back credit dramatically after the financial crisis.</p><p>Vu Thai, president of Efficient Lighting of Buena Park, Calif., wanted more space to house his energy-efficient light bulbs and fixtures at the end of 2008. &#8220;Nobody would lend to us,&#8221; Thai says.</p><p>But demand for Thai&#8217;s bulbs increased, and he snagged Home Depot as a customer last year, sending sales up 10 percent. In December, Thai secured a $100,000 loan to install racks and other equipment in his new warehouse. He bought the space with another loan of $1.6 million taken jointly from Bank of America and a government program for small businesses.</p><p>In another hopeful sign, about 75 percent of the loans taken out in the last three months were to pay for mergers and acquisitions. That shows that companies that can afford it are buying up weaker competitors as they prepare for growth in the months ahead.</p><p>&#8220;After surviving a brutal recession, companies are starting to look around them for opportunities to get stronger,&#8221; says Laura Whitley, an executive at Bank of America&#8217;s global commercial banking business.</p><p>Still, while many companies have opened up lines of credit, many aren&#8217;t using them yet, reflecting their hesitation. About 25 percent of small businesses applied to renew a credit line in 2010, while only 13 percent tried to get a business loan, according to the National Federation of Independent Business.</p><p>U.S. Bancorp CEO Richard Davis says he&#8217;s watching closely to see how many companies dip into their lines of credit for cash. He said in a recent conference call that nearly half of the bank&#8217;s customers, a record, don&#8217;t use their lines of credit at all.&#8221;</p>
Bank of America and U.S. Bank both report: “Businesses are borrowing again!”

Some good news related to the U.S. economy as reported by Pallavi Gogoi, for the AP Business Wire today. “Martin Foil’s co...
21 Jan 2011
Time to Optimize your Loan Fee Structure with Heitman Analytics’ Lender Based Loan Fee Report <p>In light of the recent industry turbulence and RESPA changes, lender fee strategies and intelligence has become even more essential. A competitive fee structure is one way to maintain viability and long-term sales projections. The Heitman Analytics’ Lender Based Loan Report offers insight into how your competitors are structuring their fees in light of the current market conditions. Lender Loan fee reports detail:</p><p>Captures lender fees for both conventional and FHA loans<br />Captures all Loan Fees Including: application, appraisal, credit, processing, underwriting, document preperation, tax service, and flood certification<br /> Retail, Wholesale, Correspondent, and Telesales reports are available<br />Loan fee report can be tailored to your specific parameters<br />Executive Summaries highlight salient trends across all major lenders and markets<br />Database or spreadsheet formats are available<br />Reports for all mortgage products in all channels will be delivered on or about March 1st 2011.</p><p><strong>For orders, samples and inquiries please call 800-727-7346 or e-mail us at: info@heitmananalytics.com</strong>
Time to Optimize your Loan Fee Structure with Heitman Analytics’ Lender Based Loan Fee Report

In light of the recent industry turbulence and RESPA changes, lender fee strategies and intelligence has become even more ...
14 Jan 2011
Money Center Banks set to Pay Dividends After 3-Years <p>Some good news reported today by the New York Times: &#8220;Financial analysts say the nation’s largest banks are ready to begin restoring their dividends in the first half of the year, after a three-year pause to repair their damaged balance sheets. The reversal could put billions of dollars in the pockets of pension funds and retirees who had viewed bank shares as dependable sources of income. </p><p>Clues to how big a payout is in store could come as early as Friday, when JPMorgan Chase announces its 2010 financial performance, the first of many earnings reports to come over the next week from the likes of Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo. </p><p>If the big banks deliver a second straight year of rising profits, as many analysts expect, the conditions would be in place for regulators to approve dividend increases by as early as March. </p><p>As the financial crisis worsened in 2008 and 2009, all but a handful of financial institutions cut their once-lucrative dividends to just pennies a share, hurting ordinary investors who had come to see them as sources of income. JPMorgan, for example, now has a dividend of 20 cents a share annually, down from $1.52 before the crisis. </p><p>Over all, the financial sector of the Standard &#038; Poor’s 500-stock index paid out $51 billion in dividends in 2007. By 2010, that figure had shrunk to $19 billion. </p><p>“It’s a significant milestone,” said Gerard Cassidy, a veteran bank analyst at RBC Capital Markets. “The return of dividends signals that the banks are back, and the Federal Reserve wants to inspire confidence in the marketplace so that banks lend more.” </p><p>The financial industry has returned to health much faster than expected, helped by an alphabet soup of federal aid programs totaling more than $3 trillion, ultralow interest rates and a surging stock market. </p><p>Banks are expected to record $70 billion in profits in 2010, according to Foresight Analytics, a financial research firm. That would be up from $12.5 billion in 2009 but remains about half the level reached in 2006, before the housing market collapsed and the financial system almost came undone. </p><p>The earnings reports for the fourth quarter of 2010 are also likely to show that corporate and consumer lending is starting to come back while losses on bad loans are continuing to ease. </p><p>Wall Street’s trading businesses are expected to turn in a strong performance because of an increase in deal-making activity late in the year. </p><p>This week the Federal Reserve began another round of so-called stress tests of the nation’s 19 largest banks, evaluating their ability to remain financially healthy in the face of a still-anemic economic recovery and tough new regulations that will cut deeply into revenues. Unlike the first round of tests, the findings this time will not be made public. </p><p>Before approving a dividend increase, regulators must sign off on a bank’s stress test and conclude that the bank can meet the higher capital requirements put in place by new international agreements and the recent overhaul of financial regulations in the United States. They also must have fully repaid any federal bailout funds they accepted at the height of the crisis. </p> <p>While the return of dividends will be welcomed by ordinary investors, it remains a delicate issue for the banks as well as regulators and politicians in Washington, said Chris Kotowski, a bank analyst with Oppenheimer. </p><p>Many voters are still angry about the government-led bailout that rescued banks after the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008. More recently, the return of bonuses on Wall Street has stirred outrage. </p><p>“It’s purely a matter of making it palatable to the public,” Mr. Kotowski said. “Banks are fully capable of doing it. But everyone’s afraid of headlines that say just two years after the bailout, the fat cats are getting dividends again.” </p><p>Partly as a result, he said, dividends will probably be restored in stages, and it could be take until the end of 2012 for them to return to historical norms. </p><p>For decades, shares of banks, along with utilities, were the favored choice of retirees and other conservative investors who looked forward to a steady payment each quarter. </p><p>That all changed when the financial crisis struck, forcing Citigroup to cut its dividend as it braced for a wave of huge losses tied to loan defaults. </p><p>Although the federal bailout program did not require banks to lower their dividends in most cases, regulators all but forced many banks into making cuts by insisting that they hold more capital in reserve to cushion against losses. </p><p>By the spring of 2009, several of the largest banks — including JPMorgan, Bank of America and Wells Fargo — cut their dividend to just pennies a share each quarter. </p><p>Just as the banks cut their dividends at different rates over the course of months, the timing of dividend increases will probably also vary widely across the industry. The strongest banks, including JPMorgan, State Street, U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo, should be in the first wave this spring, several analysts said. </p><p>For Bank of America and Citigroup, which continue to suffer steep losses on mortgages and consumer loans, the analysts said higher dividends probably would not come until later this year or early next year. </p><p>Several regional lenders, including Fifth Third Bank, KeyCorp, SunTrust and Regions Financial, are barred by regulators from raising their dividends. None of these banks have repaid their bailout money in full. </p><p>In particular, analysts and investors are eagerly anticipating what the chief executive of JPMorgan, Jamie Dimon, will say on the company’s earnings call on Friday, looking for any hint of the bank’s dividend plan. JPMorgan emerged from the financial crisis in far better shape than most of its rivals, and Mr. Dimon has been outspoken about his desire to raise his company’s payout. </p><p>“We’re going to be building up a lot of excess capital,” he said in a CNBC interview on Tuesday. “So, we would like to restart a dividend.” </p><p>Eventually, JPMorgan’s restored dividend could equal $1.50 a share annually, said Michael Scanlon, senior equity analyst with Manulife Asset Management in Boston. That would equal a yield of 3.3 percent based on its closing price of $44.45 on Thursday. </p><p>That would be up from 0.5 percent now. More important, it would catapult the yield on JPMorgan shares to far above the 2.26 percent yield on certificates of deposit, a popular vehicle for investors seeking income. </p><p>“It won’t come right out of the chute at that level,” Mr. Scanlon said. “But it’s definitely </p>
Money Center Banks set to Pay Dividends After 3-Years

Some good news reported today by the New York Times: “Financial analysts say the nation’s largest banks are ready to begin...
Legal Disclaimer & Terms of Use Twitter Entrust LinkedIn | Copyright © 2018 Heitman Analytics